-
@ToddWilde1 @PatrickJQuinn2 @BBCLBicker Sigh. We enforce personal restrictions on people ALL THE TIME, *because* we are social. Our efforts to accommodate sociality should also accommodate, as much as possible, the right for people to minimize risk of exposure.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -4 🙁
-
@ToddWilde1 @PatrickJQuinn2 @BBCLBicker And I think I'm not saying this clearly, so: most changes involving "going back to normal" fail to accommodate that. They force a lot of people who are not safe, who are at higher risk, back to risk of exposure and higher risk of severe illness or death.On twitter.com
-
@ToddWilde1 @PatrickJQuinn2 @BBCLBicker If policies were flexible and accommodating, then I wouldn't be quite as concerned personally—though I would be shaking my head about the larger failures that we'd be seeing. But when we go back to normal, most employers will instantly stop accommodating anyone at high risk.Permalink On twitter.com